SANJU RAWAT AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/28697/2023 · 2026-03-08
Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 2931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 2931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28697 of 2023 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri D.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for Agra Development Authority and Sri Hare Ram Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners on the instructions submits that no cause of action survives as the grievance of the petitioners has already redressed by the Agra Development Authority, therefore, the instant writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the same.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. March 9, 2026 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nipun Singh, Kartikeya Saran, Suchita Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent(s) : CSC, Dharmendra Singh Chauhan, Suresh C. Dwivedi (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Sanju Rawat And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad