Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2914 (BOM)

SACHIN SHIVAJI PATIL v. GRAMPANCHAYAT NOOL THR. SARPANCH AND ANR

WP/4764/2023 · 2026-08-25

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23-WP-4764-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4764 OF 2023 Sachin Shivaji Patil ...Petitioner. Versus Grampanchayat Nool And Another ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Manoj Patil a/w Siddhesh Kadam for the Petitioner. Ms. Tejas Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : August 25, 2026. P. C. : 1. By the present petition, the grievance is as regards the notice dated 06.02.2023 issued by the Gram Panchayat, Nool, informing the petitioner that the stone crusher business cannot be continued. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to carry out any stone crushing business and in respect of the notiied mines, permission for excavation is sought. 3. Considering that the petitioner does not intend to carry out any stone crushing operation, the notice dated 06.02.2023 does not afect the petitioner. In the event, any obstruction is caused in the mining Harish 1 of 2 HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Digitally signed by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date: 2026.08.25 20:12:24 +0530 23-WP-4764-2023.doc activities by the Gram Panchayat, it is open for the petitioners to revive the cause. 4. The petition is disposed of with the above direction. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Harish 2 of 2