Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2899 (BOM)

RATNAPRABHA KISHOR PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

FA/4595/2023 · 2026-08-21

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 926-fa-4595-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 4595 OF 2023 Ratnaprabha Kishor Patil VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Ors ... Ms. Shreya S. Battise h/f Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate for Appellant Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for Respondents-State ….. CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :- . Ms. Shreya S. Battise h/f Mr. Vinod P. Patil, learned Advocate for the appellant submits that inadvertently an order passed by the Reference Court under Order VII, Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code was challenged by way of First Appeal. She submits that she has instructions to withdraw the First Appeal and to file appropriate proceedings i.e. Writ Petition to challenge the impugned order. 2. Leave granted. First Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. The appellant is at liberty to file Writ Petition challenging the order impugned in this First Appeal. All contentions kept open. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2026 2026:BHC-AUG:38185