IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 2154 OF 2023 HIMMATRAO DHONDIRAM BARHATE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PARBHANI AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhise Vitthal Dnyanoba AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. S.V. Hange Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Kutti Chaudhari Chaitali R. … FIRST APPEAL NO. 2191 OF 2023 SUJAL @ LAXMIKANT S/O SARJERAO BARHATE UNDER GUARDIANSHIP OF SARJERAO VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, PARBHANI AND ORS ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhise Vitthal Dnyanoba AGP for Respondent no.1 & 2 : Mr. S.V. Hange Advocate for Respondent No.3/Acquiring Body : Mr. B. R. Survase. … FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 18219 OF 2021 LIMBAJI EKNATH KACHARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, PARBHANI AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhise Vitthal D. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. S. N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Virdhe Bhushan V. … WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2260 OF 2023 JIJABAI VISHWAWNATH MULE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND OTHERS … 2026:BHC-AUG:9175This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhise Vitthal D. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. S. N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No.3/Acquiring Body : Mr. B. R. Survase. … WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3126 OF 2023 CHATRAPATI S/O RAMCHANDRA MULE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND OTHERS … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhise Vitthal D. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. S. V. Hange Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. S.S. Dande … WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3127 OF 2023 RAMCHANDRA PUNJIRAM MULE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND OTHERS … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhise Vitthal D. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. N. D. Raje Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Ms. Deshpande Geeta L. … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 17.04.2026 PER COURT :- 1. This motion is for “speaking to the minutes” of common order dated 27.02.2026. 2. It is pointed out by learned counsel Mr. Survase who was representing for the acquiring body and his appearance has not been shown in the title clause. This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // 3. Mr. Survase represented the acquiring body and assisted this Court in deciding appeals. His name should have been reflected in the title clause of the order. The mistake is due to inadvertence. It needs to be rectified. 4. In the title clause, at the appearances of parties, name of Mr. B. R. Survase appearing for respondent/acquiring body be added in respective appeals. 5. Corrected copy be uploaded. 6. Motion for speaking to the minutes stands disposed of. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ... vmk/- This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //