2-WP-9005-2023 (C).doc S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9005 OF 2023 Puneeta Agrawal (Puneeta Sharma) ...Petitioner VERSUS Ravi Agrawal ...Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Advocate Aseem Naphade a/w. Ms. Vilasini Balasubramanian, for Petitioner. Ms. Pushpa Ganediwala a/w. Anshu Agrawal, Mr. Bhushan Shinde and Mr. Pradyumna Agrawwal i/b. Pushpa Ganediwala & Co., for Respondent. Advocate Aloka A. Nadkarni, AGP for the State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 20th AUGUST, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent and learned AGP. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the Condition No.7 imposed by the learned Family Judge, Mumbai, below Exhibit-18 i.e. “Neither petitioner nor respondent shall remove the child out of jurisdiction of Family Court or go abroad without prior permission of Family Court”. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the impugned order may be quashed. 4. On the statement of learned counsel for the respondent, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that appropriate order be passed. SONALI SATISH KILAJE Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date: 2026.08.24 10:58:53 +0530 2-WP-9005-2023 (C).doc S.S.Kilaje 5. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, I pass following order : ORDER (i) Petition is partly allowed. (ii) Condition No.7 imposed by the learned Family Court, Mumbai, by order dated 15.07.2023 that “Neither petitioner nor respondent shall remove the child out of jurisdiction of Family Court or go abroad without prior permission of Family Court” is hereby quashed and set aside. 6. Writ Petition is disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)