Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2641 (BOM)

RADHA SUNIL CHANDOLE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APL/1659/2023 · 2026-08-20

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

9.APL.1659.2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1659 OF 2023 Radha Sunil Chandole ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Another ...Respondents *** Mr. Dhananjay K. Bhosale (Through V.C.), Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Priyanka S. Rane, APP for Respondent – State. Mr. Machhindra A. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr. Baban Patil, Informant present. *** CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026 PER COURT : 1. The learned counsel for the Applicant as well as the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 – original informant submit that the Investigating Officer has filed a “C” Summary Report before the learned Trial Court on 11th January 2025, stating that no evidence has been found in the case to proceed against the Applicant. 2. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, submits that nothing remains in the present Application and, therefore, seeks disposal of the Application. The statement made by the learned counsel for the Applicant is accepted. Shrikant Malani 2026:BHC-KOL:7810-DB 9.APL.1659.2023.odt 3. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the Applicant, the Application is disposed of as infructuous. 4. Needless to clarify that if the learned Trial Court does not accept the “C” Summary Report, the Applicant is at liberty to file a fresh Application. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Shrikant Malani