1/3 7+8+9 FCA.97.2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (SR. NO.7) FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2023 Sandeep Todi .. Appellant Versus Neha Todi .. Respondent WITH (SR.NO.8) FAMILY COURT APPEAL (St.) NO.31955 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 849 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6089 OF 2026 Sandeep Khemraj Todi .. Appellant Versus Neha Sandeep Todi & Anr. .. Respondents WITH (SR.NO.9) FAMILY COURT APPEAL (St.) NO. 4380 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6090 OF 2026 Sandeep Todi .. Appellant Versus Neha Todi .. Respondent … Mr. Sujit Lahoti a/w Tejasvi Hudtarkar Nakashe and Aditya Sheth i/by Sujit Lahoti & Associates, for Respondent-wife in FCA/97/2023, FCA(ST)/31955/2023 and FCA(ST)/4380/ 2024. … CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 06th AUGUST, 2026 Rushikesh RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Date: 2026.08.07 18:33:28 +0530 2/3 7+8+9 FCA.97.2023.odt P.C:- 1. None present for the Appellant. 2. Three Family Court Appeals Bled by the husband are listed before us. The learned counsel representing Respondent No. 1- wife has placed before us a judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 07.04.2026. A copy of the said judgment is taken on record and marked as “X” for identiBcation. 3. On perusal of the aforesaid judgment, it become evidently clear that the matrimonial discord between the parties has been put to rest by the exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. The Apex Court directed that the marriage between the parties to be dissolved and also quashed/closed all pending civil, criminal and miscellaneous proceedings Bled by either party against each other and/or relatives, including all FIRs, complaints, etc. Similarly, all complaints Bled by the husband before the other authorities also stand closed. The issue of custody of the children is also decided, alongwith the amount settled towards permanent alimony, maintenance, child support, litigation expenses, etc. In the wake of the aforesaid direction, the decree was directed to be drawn accordingly, and the Appeal was disposed of. In paragraph 65 of the said judgment, the Apex Court directed that a copy of the judgment shall be forwarded by the Registry of the Court to the concerned Courts/forums and, therefore, in paragraph 31 of the Judgment, it is observed that if there are some other cases inter se between the parties, in Rushikesh 3/3 7+8+9 FCA.97.2023.odt such situation the parties were granted liberty to produce the judgment so that those proceedings shall also be closed forthwith. We have noted that the Family Court proceedings are not mentioned in paragraph 31 of the judgment. However, in the wake of the liberty granted in paragraph 65 by the Hon’ble Apex Court Court, and since the judgment is placed before us for our perusal, and the entire matrimonial discord between the parties has been put to an end by the judgment dated 07.04.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, we dispose of the Appeals alongwith the pending Interim Applications. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Rushikesh