Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2509 (BOM)

KALPANA PREMANAND NAYAK v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/11082/2023 · 2026-02-02

Smt Bharati Dangre, Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/1 9-WP-11082-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11082 OF 2023 Kalpana Premanand Nayak Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr .. Respondents Ms.Divya Kakkar h/f Swapana Kode for the Petitioner. Ms.S.A. Prabhune, AGP for the State-Respondent. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C:- 1 A limited grievance in the Petition is to decide the Appeal pending before the Additional Central P.F. Commissioner/Appellate Authority, the Appeal being presented on 14/02/2022. On hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioner and on perusal of the proceedings, since we <nd the prayer to be innocuous, we direct Respondent No.2/Appellate Authority to decide the Appeal presented to it on 14/02/2022, if it is not already decided, in expeditious manner and if at all it is pending. Due to the long pendency, we direct it to be expeditiously decided within a period of 8 weeks from today. 2 Writ Petition is disposed of with the above said direction. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) rajshree RAJSHREE KISHOR MORE Digitally signed by RAJSHREE KISHOR MORE Date: 2026.02.04 09:36:06 +0530