Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2405 (BOM)

LAXMAN BHOLARAM BUNDELE v. THE ADMINISTRATOR CIDCO OFFICE AND OTHERS

WP/14588/2023 · 2026-01-23

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 999 WRIT PETITION NO. 14588 OF 2023 LAXMAN BHOLARAM BUNDELE VERSUS THE ADMINISTRATOR CIDCO OFFICE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for petitioner : Mr. Milind Joshi Advocate for the respondent no. 1 : Ms. Snehal Kulkarni ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 23 JANUARY 2026 PER COURT : Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. By way of present petition, the petitioner assails the order dated 15.04.2017 passed below Exhibit – 5 by learned 21st Jt. CJJD, Aurangabad in RCS No. 654 of 2016 whereby application for grant of temporary injunction filed by petitioner came to be rejected. The said order was confirmed by order dated 25.08.2023 passed below Exhibit – 39 by District Judge – 4, Aurangabad in MCA No. 115 of 2017. 3. Without going into the merits of the matter, both the learned counsel submit that purpose of the petition would be served if this Court directs the trial Court to decide the Suit within a stipulated period. 4. Therefore, Trial Court is directed to decide RCS No. 654 of 2016 within a period of six (6) months from today. 5. In view thereof, writ petition is disposed of. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE arp/ 2026:BHC-AUG:4208