Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2321 (AP)

Daggumalli Dharma Rao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9292/2023 · 2026-08-30

Challa Gunaranjan, Lisa Gill

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010182292023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION No.9292 of 2023 Bench Sr.No:-1 [3584] Daggumalli Dharma Rao ...Petitioner Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 31st August, 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioner : NONE Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : GP for Agriculture & Cooperation for R.1 to R6, GP for Revenue for R.8, Ms Varshitha Kaligineedi for R.9 LISA GILL, CJ: Prayer in this writ petition reads as under: “(i) declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in not initiating proper action against the misappropriation of the amounts in the 9th respondent society and the action of the 7th respondent in not conducting proper enquiry into the misplacement of the documents in the A.P 2 HCJ & CGR, J WP_9292_2023 Cooperative Tribunal, Vijayawada, pertaining to the 9th respondent society as illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India; consequently (ii) direct the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct enquiry into the misappropriation of the funds in the 9th respondent- society after auditing its accounts and recover the misappropriated amounts; (iii) direct the 7th respondent to cause enquiry into missing of the documents (dated 21.7.2008 and 31.7.2008 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Tenali) from the registry of the A.P Cooperative Tribunal, Vijayawada pertaining to 9th respondent-society..” 2. Following order had been passed on 30.07.2026: “Mr Sateesh Kumar Eerla, learned counsel, appears on behalf of arguing counsel for petitioner and submits that said counsel is unwell and has thus given a No Objection Certificate to petitioner to engage some other counsel; however, none appears on behalf of petitioner and neither is petitioner present in person. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 31.08.2026 under caption „for dismissal‟.” 3. Today again there is no representation on behalf of petitioner and neither is he present in person despite the matter being listed under the 3 HCJ & CGR, J WP_9292_2023 caption „for dismissal‟. It appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer. 4. Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default and for non prosecution. No costs. 5. Copy of this order be conveyed to petitioner on given address. Pending application(s) if any, including IA.Nos.2, 3 & 4 of 2023 stand(s) disposed of accordingly. LISA GILL, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J Vjl Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable : Yes / No