u IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATlX^'®” ^ V TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER UJ Q''. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE a. > A AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 479 OF 7n7d Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 31.10.2023 in W.P. No. 35822 of 2022 on the file of the High Court., Between: Dr. A. Sujatha, W/o A.V. Prasad, aged about 61 Alapati Nursing Home, Ganganammapet, Tenali, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh years, Occ; Doctor, R/o. ...APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER^ AND 1. The Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, Rep by its Commissioner. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. M/s. Golden Homes Developers, 49-54-7/16, Balaiah Sastry Layout, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh Managing Director, A.V.N. Govinda Rao. Rep. by its ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS^ lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1®* Respondent to forthwith permission and occupancy certificate granted to the 3 pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.^ revoke the building Respondent, rd r Counsel for the Appellant: SRI SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI — Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI K. MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR GVMC) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MUNICIPAL^ ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI G. NARASIMHA RAO " The Court made the following: JUDGMENT *■ Bench Sr.No:-46 [3483] APHC010617612023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 479 of 2024 ...Appellant Dr. A. Sujatha Vs. ...Respondent(s) The Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation and Others ********** CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 17th September 2024 DATE P C : on behalf of Repeated adjournments have been sought in this case learned counsel for the appellant. It appears interested to pursue the matter. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No that the appellant is not costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- Nl.RAWlESH deputm registrar SECTtONT'bFFlCER //TRUE COPY// To, The Commissioner, Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Bodduluri, Advocate [OPUC] -- One CC to Sri K.Madhava Reddy (SC FOR GVMC) [OPUC] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Rao, Advocate[OPUC] -— 6. Two GO’S to GP for Municipal Administration, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati[OPUC] 7. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:17/09/2024 I 3 0 SEP 2073 |] ^ . Current Section . ^ JUDGMENT WA.No.479 of 2024 DISMISSING THE W.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS