Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2192 (AP)

Dilip Ramamurthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/1684/2023 · 2026-06-21

Sumathi Jagadam

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010034542023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1684/2023 Between: 1. DILIP RAMAMURTHY, S/O. NARAYANA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WORKING AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, GUDUPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., FOOD AND AGRICULTURE (COOPERATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 4. DISTRICT LEVEL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE, CHITTOOR REP.BY ITS CONVENER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, CHITTOOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in 2 not paying the full salary and increments for the suspension period to the petitioner for the suspension period from 06-07-2013 to 19-07-2020 though the same was regularized by way of resolutions dt.20.07.2020 and 30.09.2020 and also in the light of enquiry report dt.21-12-2020, in RC No.487/2022-B dt.07-12-2022 addressed by the 2nd respondent to 4th respondent and also in spite of repeated representations and correspondence in this regard as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, without consideration of relevant material including enquiry report and against the statutory provisions including F.R.54-B(3) and consequently direct the respondents to pay the full salary and increments for the suspension period along with arrears and interest by directing the 4th respondent to take appropriate action on the communication addressed in RC No.487/2022-B dt.07-12-2022 by the 2nd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent to take appropriate action on the communication addressed in RC No.487/2022-B dt.07-12-2022 by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave for filing counter affidavit in the Writ Petition No. 1684/2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR 2. GP FOR SERVICES II 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 22.06.2026 rsd 4 7 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1684/2023 Date: 22.06.2026 rsd