Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2172 (AP)

CHERUKURU RAMESH v. K SASIDHAR

CC/187/2023 · 2026-06-15

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010710862022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187/2023 Between: 1. CHERUKURU RAMESH, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.1-17, DAMULURU VILLAGE, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K SASIDHAR, COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PVS EMPIRE, NEAR PATUR CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIILI RAO I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (P R WING) MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. K PADMA JOYTHI, EXTENSION OFFICER (PR AND RD), NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. D SRINIVASA RAO, MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. J SUNITHA, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. A VENKATESWARA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA. 7. GADELA VENKATA RAMA RAO, SARPANCH, GRAM PANCHAYATH, DAMULURU VILLAGE, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 8. M JEEVAN JOYTHI, SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYATH, DAMULURU VILLAGE, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful violation and disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No.20523 of 2022 dated 25-07-2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the order passed in WP.No.20523 of 2022 dated 25.07.2022. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) 3. P PRABHAKAR RAO 4. N SRIHARI 5. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI-08069/AP/3204/2001 The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:187 OF 2023 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 17.04.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20523 of 2022. 2. Heard Sri Ragunandan, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ragunanda, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that pending contempt case, the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court. Hence, no further orders are necessary and requested to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 16.06.2026 BSP 4 91 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.187 of 2023 16.06.2026 BSP