APHC010068302023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 349/2023 Between: 1. K SREENIVASULU, S/O.K.REDDEPPA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.2-86, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATI, NOW AT D.NO.532, WARD NO.19,STREET NO.1, NARAYANAPURAM, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MARGADARSI CHIT FUND PVT LTD, TIRUPATI BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER/ FOREMAN C.KESAVULU NAIDU, S/O LATE C.KRISHNAMA NAIDU, RESIDING AT TIRUPATI. 2. K VANI, W/O K.K.RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.13-6-600/44/23, P.K.LAYOUT, TIRUPATI TOWA AND DISTRICT. 3. K SREENIVASULU, S/O.K.VENKATRAMANA, AGED ABOUT 33YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.13-6-600-44-22A, P.K.LAYOUT, TIRUPATI TOWN AND DISTRICT. 4. K MALLIKARJUNA, S/O.K.VENKATRAMANA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.13-6-600-44- 22A, P.K.LAYOUT, TIRUPATI TOWN AND DISTRICT. 5. K RAMESH, S/O. K.CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.13-6-600-44-23, P.K. LAYOUT, TIRUPATI TOWN AND DISTRICT. 6. S MOHAMMED ALI, S/O.S.JAMAL MOHIDDIN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.20-5- 202/A, S.G.COLONY, KORLAKUNTA, NEAR UNIVERSAL LIBRARY, TIRUPATI TOWN AND DISTRICT. 7. G VENKATRAMANA NAIDU, S/O.G.KRISHNAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.6-6- 492, IRLA NAGAR, OPP.PALLAVI APARTMENT, TIRUPATI TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Revision is filed against the docket order dt.05.01.2023 passed in E.A.No.353 of 2022 in E.P.No. 16 of 2014 in O.S. No. 84 of 2010 on the file of the V Addl. District Judge at Tirupati, IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No. 16 of 2014 in O.S. No. 84 of 2010 on the file of the V Addl. District Judge at Tirupathi pending disposal of the above revision and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER When the revision is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that by afflux of time, cause in this revision does not survive for adjudication and the same has now rendered infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is Dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD