APHC010512072023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5624/2023 Between: 1. D SATHAR SAHEB, S/O LATE.D YAKHUB SAHEB. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OEC. JUNIOR ASSISTANT R/O VALMIXIPURAM PANCHAYATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT.AP. 2. S MUBARAK, S/O S EBRAHIMSAHEB. AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS OCC. ATTENDER R/O KALLUR PANCHAYATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT AP ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS BY. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,FINANCE ANDPLANNING DEPARTMENT.SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SMT SURYA KUMARI IAS, THE COMMISSIONER , PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT . 4. MR SHAN MOHAN SAGILI I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 2 5. SMT T LAKSHMI, THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER (D P 0 ) CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, and deliberately of violating the Order dated 8-9-2022 passed in W.P.No.22489 of 2020 in the interest of justice, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KRISHNA RAO M Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VADAPALLI RAMESH 2. G V S KISHORE KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.5624 of 2023 ORDER: Sri Vadapalli Ramesh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5 appeared through virtual mode and stated that orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents and the same was not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 16.06.2026 KBN 4 65 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.5624 of 2023 16.06.2026 KKBBNN