Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010575302023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6205/2023 Between:
1. B.SATYANARAYANA, S/O POCHAM AGED 56 YEARS, WATCHMAN SVVVS COLLEGE, TTDS, SECUNDERBAD R/O. SECUNDERABAD.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI A V DHARMA REDDY, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
2. MS S BHARGAVI I A S, JOINT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 for their willful, intentional and deliberate disobedience of the said Interim order dt.04.05.2023 in WP No.16370/2018 passed by the Hon'ble Sri Justice Tarlada Rajashekar Rao and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant interim directions directing the Respondents herein to forthwith send proposals to the Government for change of date of regularization of my services, in terms of the Interim Order dt.04.05.2023 in WP No. 16370/2018, pending disposal of the Contempt Case and pass
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RATHANGA PANI REDDY K (STANDING COUNSEL FOR TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS)
2. C SRINIVASA BABA The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.6205 of 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents and the proceedings dated 10.03.2026 are placed on record. The said fact was not disputed by the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.06.2026 SJ
4
34 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.6205 of 2023
17.06.2026 SSJJ