Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2137 (AP)

GAJULA RAMA MOHANA RAO v. ADAPA RAMJI ROW

CRP/287/2023 · 2026-06-15

Subba Reddy Satti

Original Suitbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010052132023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 287/2023 Between: 1. GAJULA RAMA MOHANA RAO, S/O.NAGA MANEENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.BANTUMILLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ADAPA RAMJI ROW, S/O.LATE RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS, R/O.MULAPARNI VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SUGNANAMNAGESWARARAO, S/O.VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O.BANTUMILLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to begs to present the above Revision Petition in this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the Order dt.10-08-2022 in I.A.No.357 of 2021 in I.A.No.324 of 2021 in O.S.No.310 of 2021 on the file of Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Kaikaluru, Krishna District, IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.310 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Kaikaluru, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above Revision Petition in this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SURAYYA SEELAM The Court made the following order : Sri Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel, representing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that by efflux of time the cause in this Civil Revision Petition does not survive and therefore, the Civil Revision Petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications in this case shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 16.06.2026 ikn HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.287 of 2023 Date : 16.06.2026 ikn