Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2092 (AP)

M/S. ADANI WILMAR LTD., v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16781/2023 · 2026-05-07

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010327422023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16781/2023 Between: 1. M/S. ADANI WILMAR LTD.,, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 263, 268, 269, 287, THAMMAVARAM, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP., BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY CHINMAY CHAND. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, ROOM NO. 102, GROUND FLOOR, BLOCK 2, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES, , GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 8TH FLOOR, APIIC TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI - 522503 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR II OF INDUSTRIES, O/O THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES, 8TH FLOOR, APIIC TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI 522503. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue or grant an order, direction or 2 writ, more so in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing a sum of Rs.3,01,21,054/- to the Petitioner company towards 'Reimbursement of Sales Tax Incentive' for the years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17and 2017-18 under the Industrial Investment Promotion Policy (IIPP) for the period 2010-2015 inspite of the Petitioner company being eligible for the same as illegal, arbitrary and highhanded, apart from being violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India, and consequently, direct the Respondents to release the sum of Rs.3,01,21,054/- to the Petitioner company towards 'Reimbursement of Sales Tax Incentive' for the years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17and 2017- 18under the Industrial Investment Promotion Policy (IIPP) for the period 2010-2015and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation dated 10.04.2023 submitted by the Petitioner company to the Respondents and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAILASH NATH P S S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16781 of 2023 The Court made the following Order: Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdrawn the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 08.05.2026 PSA