Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2083 (CAL)

SAIKAT MONDAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/20899/2023 · 2026-09-09

Partha Sarathi Sen

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

N.22Sl 151/CL 09.09.26 DL-01 Ct.-19 (S.R.) WPA 20899 of 2023 Saikat Mondal v. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Souradeep Banerjee Ms. Sanjana Sinha Mr. Aditi Gupta … for the petitioner. Mr. Puspal Chakraborty Mr. Debobrata Dey Mr. Saptarshi Mukherjee Mr. Trithankar Nandi … for the respondent nos.2 to 4. Mr. N. Bhattacharjee Mr. J.D. Chakraborty … for the State. 1. The petitioner and the respondent nos.2 to 4 are represented by their respective learned counsel. 2. At the time of hearing learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner has handed over a letter dated 27.08.2026, as claimed to have been issued by the writ petitioner, requesting his learned advocate not to proceed with the instant writ petition. It is submitted that in view of issuance of such letter, an appropriate order may be passed in connection with the instant writ petition. 3. Perused the letter dated 27.08.2026, which is taken on record. 4. Heard learned advocates for the parties. 5. WPA 20899 of 2023 is dismissed for non- prosecution. 6. With the dismissal of the instant writ petition all pending interlocutory applications, if there be any, stand hereby disposed of. 7. Interim order, if there be any, stands vacated. 8. There shall, however, no order as to costs. 9. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities. (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 2