APHC010138582023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7028/2023 Between: 1. KATHI SIVAHARSHA REDDY, S/O LATE K.S.PRASAD, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O. D.NO.19-6-18, D.R. MAHAL ROAD, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ROADS AND BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTHI DIVISION, SRIKALAHASTHI. 5. THE TAHSILDHAR, RENIG,UNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 6. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI. 2 8. THE SUB REGISTRAR, THUKIVAKAM, SRO, CODE.1018, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 9. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAVAN PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI -110075. 10. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS CORPORATE OFFICE AT G5 AND G6 SECTOR 10 DWARAKA NEW DELHI. 11. A VEERA REDDY, S/O. PEDDA MUNI REDDY, R/O. TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in wrongly classifying the private lands of the petitioner upto an extent of Ac.0.21 cents in Sy.No.708/8K of Tirupati District (previously Chittoor District), Renigunta Mandal, Thukivakam Village accounts as highways and in further sub diving the said lands as Sy.No.708/8K3 and in mutating the name of the 11th respondent for the entire extent of land, without affording a reasonable opportunity or assigning any valid reasons as per se illegal, manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, irrational, perverse, unfair, biased, preposterous, whimsical, capricious, unconscionable, unconstitutional besides being violative of Principles of Natural Justice besides being opposed to the very spirit and object of Justice and Fair-play and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and for a consequential direction to rectify the wrong classification of the said lands and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner's lands upto an extent of Ac.0.21 cents in Sy.No.708/8K of Tirupati 3 District (previously Chittoor District), Renigunta Mandal, Thukivakam Village accounts, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th, 6th and 7th respondents not to entertain any registrations with respect to lands upto an extent of Ac.0.21 cents in Sy.No.708/8K and Ac.0.27 cents in Sy.No.708/8K3 of Tirupati District (previously Chittoor District), Renigunta Mandal, Thukivakam Village accounts, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 4. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.7028 OF 2023 ORDER: Ms. B.Moksha Samhita, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that matter has been settled and the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, learned counsel sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 07.05.2026 KBN 5 70 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.7028 of 2023 Date: 07.05.2026 KBN