Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2043 (AP)

B.V.V.GOPALA KRISHNA v. DR.MANJULA.D.HOSMAN

CC/5749/2023 · 2026-05-03

D Ramesh

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010530222023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5749/2023 Between: 1. B.V.V.GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O BHEEMESWAR RAO, AGE 42 YEARS, LAB TECHNICIAN GR II , PHC UNDRAJAVARAM, ELURU DIST. 2. V.TEJASWI,, S/O V.CHINNA RAO, AGE 34 YEARS, LAB TECHNICIAN GR.II, PHC T.NARSAPURAM, ELURU DIST. 3. V.A.SIVA PRASAD,, S/O BHIMESWAR RAO, AGE 38 YEARS, LAB TECHNICIAN GRADE-II, PHC DWARAKA TIRUMALA, ELURU DIST. 4. B.KUMARRAJU,, S/O SOMAYYA, AGE 48 YEARS, LAB TECHNICIAN GRADE-II, PHC VALLURU, ELURU DIST. 5. V.NOBLE VIJAY KUMAR,, S/O ALFRED, AGE 44 YEARS, LAB TECHNICIAN GRADE-II, PHC V.R.GUDEM, ELURU DIST ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DR MANJULA D HOSMAN, W/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT OF HEALTH MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. J NEEVAS, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 49 YRS, THE COMMISSIONER OF FAMILY WELFARE, GOLLAPUDI, N.T.R. DIST. 3. V RAMIREDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 48 YRS, DIRECTOR OF HELATH, GOLLAPUDI, N.T.R. DIST. 4. V PRASANNA VENKATESH, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGE 45 YEARS, DIST COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ELURU DIST, ELURU. 5. DT ASHAL, , W/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, THE DIST MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, ELURU DIST, ELURU. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to order notice to the respondents herein for wilful Violation of legitimate Interim orders of this Hon'ble court in W.P.No. 16615/2023 dated 10.7.2023 on the file of this Hon'ble Court , the above orders passed by Hon'ble Justice D.Rameshgaru, punish the Respondents herein under the provisions Contempt of Courts Act for will full disobedience of above orders and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VADAPALLI RAMESH The Court made the following: 1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the interim orders dated 10.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16615 of 2023. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the contemnors have complied with the interim orders dated 10.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16615 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :04.05.2026 klk 56 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH C.C. No.5749 of 2023 04.05.2026 kkllkk