IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2353 of 2023 ====================================================== M/s Mahalaxmi Edables Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Indu Bhushan Kumar, male, aged about 37 years, S/o Shatrughan Singh, R/o- Village- Rampur Diara, P.O. and P.S.- Maner, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Energy, Government of Bihar, 8 Daroga Rai Path Patna. 3. The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority through its Managing Director, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 4. South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited through its Secretary having its office at Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. The Chief Engineer, South Bihar Power Distribution Power Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 6. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, South Bihar Power Distribution Power Company Ltd., Arrah, Bhojpur. 7. The Electrical Executive Engineer, South Bihar Power Distribution Power Company Ltd., Arrah, Bhojpur. 8. S.D.O. (Electricity), South Bihar Power Distribution Power Company Ltd., Maner, Patna. 9. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its Manager, Giddha, Arrah. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Harsh Kaushal, Adv. Mr. Aman Raj, Adv. Ms. Annapurna Sinha, Adv. Mr. Aashish Kumar, Adv.f Ms. Anjali, T. Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh (GA-3) Ms. Prakriti Sharma, Adv. Ms. Aditi Sharma, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 14-07-2026 1. Heard the Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Learned counsel for the respondents. Patna High Court CWJC No.2353 of 2023(4) dt.14-07-2026 2/2 2. During the course of arguments, it is specifically submitted by the Learned counsel for the respondent that a detailed counter affidavit has been filed in which it is mentioned that four electric poles of 11 KVA high tension have been removed from the petitioner’s land. Therefore, nothing remains in the Writ petition for further adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. manishkumar/- (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) U