Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2004 (PAT)

MANISH PASWAN v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./9922/2023 · 2026-07-20

Sandeep Kumar

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9922 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Nalanda ====================================================== MANISH PASWAN S/O RAMDEO PASWAN Resident of Village- Lakhama, P.S.- Parwapur District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. PUTUS SINGH S/O ARBIND SINGH Resident of Village- Alipur P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda 3. KAMAL SINGH S/O LATE KEDAR SINGH Resident of Village- Alipur P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda 4. GORAKH SINGH S/O BHUSHAN SINGH Resident of Village- Alipur P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda 5. SATBEER SINGH S/O RAGHU SINGH Resident of Village- Alipur P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda 6. VIKASH SINGH S/O RAGHU SINGH Resident of Village- Alipur P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda 7. SATYAJEET SINGH S/O SATYNARAIN SINGH Resident of Village- Alipur P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda 8. GOLU SINGH S/O ANIL SINGH Resident of Village- Alipur P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr.Usha Kumari 1, APP For the O.P. Nos. 2 to 8 : Mr.Rohit Raj, Advocate Ms.Richa Raj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 20-07-2026 None appears for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rohit Raj, learned counsel for O.P.Nos. 2 to 8 and Ms. Usha Kumari I, learned counsel for the State are present. 3. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to Opposite Party nos. 2 to 8 vide Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9922 of 2023(3) dt.20-07-2026 2/2 order dated 22.10.2022 passed in Bihar Shariff Nalanda SC/ST P.S. Case No. 47 of 2022. 4. This case is held to be not maintainable, therefore the same stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal against the impugned order. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U