Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 2002 (PAT)

Kanti Devi v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/13939/2023 · 2026-07-16

Purnendu Singh

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13939 of 2023 ====================================================== Kanti Devi W/o - Late Surendra Singh, Resident of Village - Bangara (West tola) Post - Bangara, P.S. - Daudpur, Dist - Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director General of Police, Home Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Patna, Govt. of Bihar. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Chapara. 5. The Dy. S.P Chapra. 6. Sub-Divisional Police Officer Chapra. 7. The Accountant General, Patna, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Shankar Choubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Irshad, AC to SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 8 16-07-2026 Heard Mr. Bijay Shankar Choubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Md. Irshad, learned AC to SC-1 for the State. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State informs that in paragraphs no. 7 to 12 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4, information has been given that retiral dues under different heads has already been paid to the petitioner, to which, the petitioner has not raised any objection. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CWJC No.13939 of 2023(8) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 petitioner submitted that petitioner seeks to file a detailed representation in respect of those dues, which are still to be paid by the State-respondent no. 4. 4. Considering that the petitioner has substantially been paid retiral dues under different heads, the petitioner, if so advised, may file a detailed representation for those dues, which are still to be paid to him, before the appropriate authority, who is directed to hear the grievance of the petitioner and redress the same by disposing the representation filed on behalf of the petitioner expeditiously, in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Niraj/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U