APHC010126532023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1750/2023 Between: 1. A.MADHUSUDAN RAO, S/O A. RAMI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. FULL-TIME CONTINGENT WATCHMAN IN IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT R/ O. SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. R SATISH, ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF (IW) WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. PONNADA SUDHAKAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION CIRCLE SRIKAKULAM TOWN SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. B SRINADHA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT SEETHAMPETA MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. NARAYANA RAO, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT SMI SUB-DIVISION SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent for willfully disobeying the orders of Sri.JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA in 2 W.P.No.41783/2022 dated 27-12-2022 under section 10 to 12 of Contempt Act in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V K NAIDU The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:1750 OF 2023 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 27.12.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.41783 of 2022. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that since the writ petition itself is disposed of, the contempt case filed against the order dated 27.12.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.41783 of 2022 cannot be enforced. Hence, no further orders are necessary and requested to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 06.04.2026 BSP 4 125 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.1750 of 2023 06.04.2026 BSP