Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1888 (AP)

Smt.S.Ammaji, v. Sri S.S.Rawat, IAS,

CC/2750/2023 · 2026-04-20

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010223112023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2750/2023 Between: 1. SMT.S.AMMAJI,, W/O. I. NARAHARI, AGE 70 YEARS, SECRETARY GRADE - III (RETD.), AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, THIRUVURU. -521 235, KRISHNA DISTRICT, R/O D.NO.14-51, KARANAM BAZAR, PORANKI - 521 137, PENAMALUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S S RAWAT IAS, SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE (HR.III, PENSION AND GPF) DEPT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ARNARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI CHIRANJEEV CHOWDHARY IFS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT , AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION (VIG.II) DEPT, VELAGAPUDI, ARNARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. SRI RAHUL PANDEY IFS, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, CHUTTUGUNTA, OLD MICHI YARD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the Respondents Contemnors under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act for willfully and 2 intentionally violating and Deliberately disobeying the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No.39224 of 2022 dt..5.12.2022 under the Provisions of Contempt of Court Act in the interests of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. C SUMON 2. G V S KISHORE KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:2750/2023 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 05.12.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.39224 of 2022. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed that the order impugned in the present contempt case was challenged by way of writ appeal i.e., W.A.No.606 of 2023, wherein, the Division Bench of this Court was pleased to pass an interim order staying the operation of the orders passed by this Court in the Writ Petition in the year, 2023. It is further observed that although an interim order was passed in the writ appeal in the year, 2023, so far, the interim order was neither vacated nor any further orders were passed in the Writ Appeal. 4. The contempt petition has been posting from time to time for awaiting the result of the Writ Appeal and posted more than twenty times after the interim orders passed in Writ Appeal dated 11.10.2023. Even today, neither the interim order passed in the writ appeal has been vacated nor passed any further directions. 4 5. In view of the pendency of the writ appeal and the subsistence of the interim stay, once the order of this Court has been stayed, the same cannot be enforced in the present contempt proceedings. Therefore, no further orders are necessary at present in the present contempt case. 6. Accordingly, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 21.04.2026 BSP 5 8 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.2750 of 2023 21.04.2026 BSP