Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1886 (GAU)

MANAS PICNIC SPOT MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/7235/2023 · 2026-09-15

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010275972023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7235/2023 MANAS PICNIC SPOT MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE NARAYANGURI, ((NEAR MANAS NATIONAL PARK), P.O. BARENGBARI, P.S. GOBARDHANA, DIST. BAKSA (BTC), ASSAM, PIN- 781315, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, NIZAM UDDIN, S/O- ABUR RAHMAN, R/O- RAGHAB BEEL, RAGHA BILL, P.O. BARENGABARI, DIST. BAKSA (BTC), ASSAM, PIN- 781315. VERSUS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND 5 ORS BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL SECRETARIAT, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION (BTR), ASSAM, PIN- 783370. 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL SECRETARIAT KOKRAJHAR BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION (BTR) ASSAM PIN- 783370. 3:THE DIRECTOR CUM CHD TOURISM DEPARTMENT BTC KOKRAJHAR FOREST COLONY WARD NO. 05 ASSAM PIN- 783370. 4:JAHURUL ISLAM Page No.# 2/3 S/O- RAMJAN ALI VILL.- NARAYANGURI P.O. BARENGABARI P.S. GOBARDHANA DIST. BAKSA PIN- 781315. (PRESIDENT THE NARAYANGURI ECO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (EDC). 5:BANJIT DAS S/O- HARE KRISHNA DAS EMPLOYEE OF MANAS TIGER PROJECT VILL.- BAMUN BARADI TIGER PROJECT VILL.- BAMUN BARADI P.O. P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301. (GENERAL SECRETARY THE NARAYANGURI ECO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (EDC). 6:THE ADDITIONAL MAGISTRATE AND I/C SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SALBARI BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781318 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R S SADIAL, MR. M L PANDIA,MR. M R SODIAL Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BTC, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 16.09.2026 Heard Mr. M R Sodial, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A Atrea, learned Standing counsel, BTC and Mr. R Talukdar, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. Mr. M R Sodial, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has received Page No.# 3/3 instruction not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the same. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the instant writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant