Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1880 (GAU)

Yumpe Taipodia v. Marto Riba

Cont.Cas(C)/10/2023 · 2026-09-15

Kardak Ete

Contempt Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040005342023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/10/2023 Yumpe Taipodia Age: 50 Occupation : Address:S/o Doyum Taipodia Resident of Village Liru PO/PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Marto Riba Age: 0 Occupation : Address:The Deputy Commissioner Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. ------------ Advocate for : T T Tara Sr. Adv Advocate for : I Riram appearing for Marto Riba: Advocate appearing for respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Page No.# 2/2 Date : 16.09.2026 Heard Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the petitioner. The alleged contemnor has filed the affidavit by annexing the order dated 04.12.2023. It reflects that the petitioner was heard as per the direction of this Court dated 25.01.2023 wherein, the petitioner appears to have admitted that all the plots of land where the LPCs have been issued are not disturbed from any side, accordingly, it has been decided by the alleged contemnor that the plots of land where the LPC have been issued to the petitioner and his relatives will be entered and showed in the index list of map of the final notice as and when the entire matter regarding headquarter issues will be resolved. Although Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously submitted that the alleged contemnor has violated the order of this Court before hearing the petitioner, this Court is of unhesitant view that the order of this Court dated 25.01.2023 has duly been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.16 15:16:34 +05'30'