Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1875 (GAU)

M/s Oishy Enterprise v. THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors.

WP(C)/58/2023 · 2026-09-13

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040001562023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/58/2023 M/s Oishy Enterprise Represented by its Proprietor Shri Angkin Lego, S/o Shri Ngangin Lego, R/o Village Yagpo, Pasighat, PO/PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. Cont. No 919436807127 VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors. Represented by the Secretary, Town Planning and Urban Local Bodies, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chairperson Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Chief Executive Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak, Tsering Gyatso,Amy Talom,Tumba Ango Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), N Khera Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 14.09.2026 Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned State Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2; and Mr. N. Khera, learned counsel for respondent No. 3, submit that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant