Langda Yapek and 5 Ors. v. the Deputy Commissioner and 4 Ors.
WP(C)/297/2023 · 2026-08-16
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1838 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1838 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040008692023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/297/2023 Langda Yapek and 5 Ors. W/o Shri Langda Tassar, Resident of Lapang Ato Colony, PO/PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. M. No. 7641916781 2: Charu Yakap Age: Occupation : W/o Shri Charu Ganiya
R/o G Sector Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papum Pare District AP 3: Gora Yaro Age: Occupation : W/o Lt. Gora Tacho
R/o Ganga Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papum Pare District AP 4: Byabang Kampu Age: Occupation : W/o Shri Byabang Lotak
R/o D Sector Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar
Page No.# 2/3 Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Tulam Yaji Age: Occupation : W/o Shri Byabang Lotak
R/o D Sector Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Dare Yama Age: Occupation : W/o Shri Dare Tapang
R/o Donyi Polo Colony Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS the Deputy Commissioner and 4 Ors. Itanagar Capital Complex, District Papum Pare, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. 2:the Estate Officer cum ADC Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Capital Complex Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. 3:Dr. Biman Natung Age: 0 Occupation : Resident of Ganga Market Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:Taro Tagio Age: 0 Occupation : Resident of Ganga Market Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar
Page No.# 3/3 Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Tok Tama Age: 0 Occupation : Resident of Ganga Market Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka, Chorpok Modi,A Saring,N Rama,N Kanu,P Tatam,T Rahul,N Kuma,Bomyom Ori Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 17.08.2026 Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant