Chukhu Bablu and Anr. v. THE STATE OF AP and 14 Ors.
WP(C)/243/2023 · 2026-08-16
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1836 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1836 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/5 GAHC040006602023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/243/2023 Chukhu Bablu and Anr. ZPM XVI Gumto Zilla Parishad Constituency, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh, Son of Chukhu Loma, Resident of Village Gumto I, PO Doimukh, PS Doimukh, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh, Mobile No. 9436844444. 2: Techi Necha Age: Occupation : Member Disciplinary Action Committee Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh Son of Late Techi Kaha
PO RK Mission PS Chimpu Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 943605986 VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 14 Ors. Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Yupia District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The ADC cum Member Secretary
Page No.# 2/5 Age: 0 Occupation : Zilla Parisad Yupia DIstrict Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh. 4:Nabam Yakum Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM XIV Parang Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and wife of Nabam Tadap
Resident of Village Parang III Sagalee Papum Pare DIstrict Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Bamang Yayu Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM III Kimin Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and wife of Shri Bamang Mangha
Resident of Villlage Kimin Model Village KImin Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Hina Camdir Tok Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM IV Upper Balijan Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and son of Topu Tok Resident of Basarnalo Village PO/PS Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:Tem Pika Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM V Lower Balijan Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and wife of Tem Kaya Resident of Kochubari Village PO/PS Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 3/5 8:Tem Yaba Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM VI Taraso Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District wife of Shri Tem Tatik Resident of Village Kochubari Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 9:Nabam Yajar Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM VIII Mengio Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District Wife of Nabam Hari Resident of Village Tacha Mengio Sagalee Ciecle Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 10:Nabam Tagi Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM IX Leporiang Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and son of Nabam Soha
Presently residing at B Sector Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 11:Techi Niya Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM XV Silsango Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and Resident of Nyopang 1 Silsango Circle Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
12:Tai Sangte Age: 0 Occupation : ZPM XVI Kakoi Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 4/5 13:Taba Rama Age: 0 Occupation : X Toru ZPM Constituency Papum Pare District and son of Taba Gomb resident of Mepsoro Toru Sagalee Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 14:Techi Serbang Age: 0 Occupation : VII Sagalee ZPM Constituency Papum Pare District and son of Techi Taram resident of Pang Sagalee Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 15:Taba Bishnu Age: 0 Occupation : Mandal President 16th Sagalee BJP Unit Resident of Village Rachi Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Puto Bui, Tashap Nima Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Goyi Taba Raju,Kangge Taggu,Tonni Gammi,Amy Talom,Tanur Gao,Tsering Gyatso,Adam Tatak,Likha Tabin,T Taluk,Taba Tagum,R koyu
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 17-08-2026
None appears for the petitioners. Ms. K. Wangmo, learned State Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3,
Page No.# 5/5 and Mr. R. Koyu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 4 to 15, are present. The present writ petition pertains to the rejection of a complaint filed by petitioner No. 2 seeking disqualification of nine Zilla Parishad Members (ZPMs), who were elected in the Panchayat election held in the year 2020. The subsequent Panchayat election has already been conducted in the year 2025. In view of the subsequent election and the fact that the term of the ZPMs elected in the year 2020 has already come to an end, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant