SAMBHU CHARAN BARMAN, v. ON THE DEATH OF MANGAL SINGH BORO
I.A.(Civil)/3007/2023 · 2026-07-30
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1834 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1834 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010220342023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3007/2023 SAMBHU CHARAN BARMAN, S/O- LATE SURENDRA CHARAN BARMAN, R/O- VILL- DHALIGAON, P.O.
DHALIGAON, DIST- CHIRANG, B.T.A.D., ASSAM, PIN- 783385. VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF MANGAL SINGH BORO HIS LEGAL HEIRS SUMITRA BASUMATARY AND ORS 2:SMT. SUMITRA BASUMATARY W/O- LATE MANGAL SINGH BORO R/O- VILL- LAUJURIPARA P.O. KHAGRABARI P.S. DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG B.T.A.D. ASSAM PIN- 783380.
3:SMT. DIPTI BASUMATARY W/O- LATE MANGAL SINGH BORO R/O- VILL- LAUJURIPARA P.O. KHAGRABARI P.S. DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG B.T.A.D. ASSAM PIN- 783380 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A C SARMA,
Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M SARANIA(R-ALL), N GOGOI(R-ALL),MR. S SAIKIA(R- ALL),MR A SARANIA(R-ALL),MR. B G OWARY(R-ALL) Linked Case : RSA/231/2019 SAMBHU CHARAN BARMAN S/O- LATE SURENDRA CHARAN BARMAN R/O- VILL- DHALIGAON P.O. DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG B.T.A.D. ASSAM PIN- 783385. VERSUS SANI RAM BORO S/O- LATE BARTHEKERE BRAHMA R/O- VILL- LAUJURIPARA P.O. KHAGRABARI P.S. DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG B.T.A.D. ASSAM PIN- 783380.
2:MANGAL SINGH BORO S/O- SRI SANI RAM BORO R/O- VILL- LAUJURIPARA P.O. KHAGRABARI P.S. DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG B.T.A.D. ASSAM PIN- 783380. ------------ Advocate for : MR. A C SARMA Advocate for : appearing for SANI RAM BORO
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 31.07.2026 Heard Mr. B. Deori, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr.A. Sarania, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of 159 days delay in preferring the connected Regular Second Appeal.
3. Mr. Sarania has fairly submitted that he has no objection if the delay is condoned.
4. I have perused the application and found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained.
5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned.
6. The connected Regular Second Appeal shall be listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant