Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1825 (GAU)

Meyi Karga v. THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors.

WP(C)/200/2023 · 2026-07-23

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040005332023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/200/2023 Meyi Karga D/o Late Tame Karga, Permanent Residence of Village Kamki, PO/PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, Presently residing at Arunachal Bhawan, New Delhi VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors. Represented by the Secretary, Department of Land Management, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chief Estate Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Capital Complex Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Capital Complex Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:Extra Assistant Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Capital Complex Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Advocate for the Petitioner : Gumto Kato, Gamken Bam,Nyado Karga,Kirmani Lollen,Terji Page No.# 2/2 Kamchi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Elina Perme,Duge Soki BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 24-07-2026 Mr. G. Kato, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition in view of the fact that there is an appeal provision under Section 83 of the Arunachal Pradesh (Land Settlement and Records) Act, 2000, whereby an appeal shall lie before the Government, represented by the concerned Secretary, against the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner. Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate, is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant