CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI 2 1188..0022..22002266 adeb Ct. No. 5 WPA 961 of 2023 IA No. CAN 8 of 2025 Amit Agarwala Foundation & Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Chayan Gupta ….For the petitioners Mr. Hirak Barman Mr. Bikash Singha ...For the State 1. Matter has been accommodated in today’s list under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ on being mentioned by the learned advocate representing the petitioners. 2. Mr. Chayan Gupta, learned advocate representing the petitioners virtually submits on instruction that petitioners do not press this writ petition as there is possibility of settling the issue involved in this writ petition out of Court. However, leave is prayed for to take steps in accordance with law, if settlement fails. 3. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioners writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 2 5. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioners to take steps in accordance with law, if so requires in future. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 7. Application, if any pending, also stands dismissed. 8. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)