Chandeshwar Kumar Sah @ Chandeshwar Sah v. The State of Bihar
MJC/2950/2023 · 2026-05-07
Rajiv Roy
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1792 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1792 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2950 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16489 of 2018 ====================================================== Chandeshwar Kumar Sah @ Chandeshwar Sah Son of Binda Sah Resident of Village and P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Mr. Amir Subhani.
2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Mr. N. Saravana Kumar.
3. The Commissioner, Saran at Chapra, namely Mr. Saravanan M.
4. The D.M., Gopalganj, namely Mr. Nawal Kishor Choudhary.
5. The D.D.C., Gopalganj, namely Mr. Abhishek Ranjan.
6. The D.P.O., Gopalganj, namely Mr. Raj Kishore Singh.
7. B.D.O., Baikunthpur, Gopalganj, namely Mr. Ashok Kumar.
8. Block Programme Officer, Baikunthpur, Gopalganj, namely Mr. Ashok Kumar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh (Ga 2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 07-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s)
"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 06.09.2018 passed in CWJC No.17641 of 2017."
Patna High Court MJC No.2950 of 2023(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2
3. The show cause of the opposite party is on record and the learned State counsel has taken this Court to the order dated 04.12.2023 issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Gopalganj to show that the representation stands rejected.
4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U