IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13271 of 2023 ====================================================== Jai Prakash Bhagat @ Jai Prakash Das Son of Late Ramdhani sah Bhagat, Resident of village - Itahari, P.S. O.P. Banma Itahari, District-Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The state of Bihar Through the Additional Chief Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar. 2. The Collector cum - District Magistrate, Saharsa. 3. The Add. Collector cum Add. District Magistrate, Saharsa. 4. The Block Development Officer, Banma Itahari, Saharsa. 5. The Circle officer, Banma Itahari, Saharsa. 6. The Block working Programme officer, Banma Itahari, Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navnit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 07-04-2026 Heard Mr. Navnit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “I. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order/orders, directing /commanding restraining the respondents for making any construction over the khatiyani /settled land of the petitioner pertaining to khata no. 803, khesara no. 531, thana no. 321, area 6 acres23 decimal and khata no. 802, khesara no. 596, area 01 acres 80 decimal situated in Mauza Itahari. II. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, Patna High Court CWJC No.13271 of 2023(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/2 order/orders directing the respondents to follow due procedure of land acquisition and acquired the raiyat / settled land of the petitioner pertaining to khata no. 803, khesara no. 531, area 6 acres 23 decimal and khata no. 802 , khesara no. 596, area 01 acres 80 decimal And awarding / granting compensation to the petitioner. III. For issuance of any other relief / reliefs, interim relief/ reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled too.” 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that alongwith all the documents, he shall be approaching the respondent no. 2, the Collector, Saharsa for the redressal of the grievance. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it. 5. In that background, allowing the petitioner to approach the Collector, Saharsa, as recorded above, and if such petition is filed, with a direction to take the same to its logical conclusion at an earliest, the writ petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U