1 APHC010553292023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 479/2023 Between: 1. THADISETTY @ KATHARI VEERA VENKATA DURGA SANDHYA,, W/O. THADISETTY CHANDRA SEKHAR, D/O. KATHARI KRISHNA MOHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-124, MUDUNURU VILLAGE, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THADISETTY CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/o. Ramakoteswara Rao, aged about 40 years, R/o. D. No. 7-32/4E, Rajeev Gruhakalpa Road, Near Kaali Matha Temple, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District, A.P. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersMemorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Decree and Ordrer dated 07.08.2023 passed in I.A. No. 222/2021 in H.M.O.P. No. 100/2020, on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil judge, Mangalagiri 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuant to decree and order dated 07.08.2023passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri in I.A. No. 222/2021 in H.M.O.P No. 100/2020and consequently pass an order by allowing the Petition filed by the Petitionerin I.A. No. 222/2021 in H.M.O.P No. 100/2020for setting aside the exparte decree passed against the Petitioner Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI C.M.A. No.479 of 2023 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 22.04.2026, the following order was passed: “A withdrawal memo was filed on behalf of the petitioner vide U.S.R.No.32515 of 2026, the same was not signed by the appellant’s counsel. When we pointed out that, Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the appellant has signed the same. 2. Registry is directed to explain how the memo was accepted despite not being signed by the appellant’s counsel. 3. List on 23.04.2026.” 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed another memo dated 22.04.2026 in the Registry for withdrawal of the appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant is present and submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Recording the same, the C.M.A. is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 23.04.2026. Pab 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI C.M.A. No.479 of 2023 DATE: 23.04.2026 Pab