Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1718 (GAU)

UDAY SARMA AND 3 ORS v. PREETOM SAIKIA AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/90/2023 · 2026-03-10

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Contempt Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010032622023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/90/2023 UDAY SARMA AND 3 ORS S/O- LT. NARADEV SARMA, VILL- SRIPURDEOR, P.O. ADALBARI, VIA- MUSHALPUR, DIST.- BAKSA (BTAD), PIN- 781372 2: GOLAPI DEVI D/O- LT. CHAMPA RAM SARMA VILL- PACHIM KURUA P.O. KURUA DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 784145 3: CHAMPA DEVI D/O- LT. GHANA SHYAM UPADHYAYA P.O. BARUA PATHER P.O. MAIL BAZAR DIST.- BISWANATH CHARIALI ASSAM PIN- 784170 4: DHANTI SARMA S/O- DHARMA KANTA SARMA VILL AND P.O. BHAGHARA DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 78210 VERSUS PREETOM SAIKIA AND ANR THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6 2:MAMATA HOJAI Page No.# 2/2 AES DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-1 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R RONGMEI, MS. S DEVI Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 11.03.2026 Ms. S Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions passed by this Court, violation of which is alleged in the present proceedings, have been complied with and accordingly, she prays that she be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition. 2. Prayer is not objected to by Mr. S M T Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the directions passed by this Court, violation of which is alleged in the present writ petition, have been complied with, the present Contempt Petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant