Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1705 (AP)

MANNURU VENKATA RAMANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13593/2023 · 2026-04-15

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010260782023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13593/2023 Between: 1. MANNURU VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.DEVULAPALLI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 2. GALI VENKATAIAH,, S/O.GALI RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.DEVULAPALLI VILLAGE, DAKKILI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. SOKA SUBBARAMAIAH,, S/O.SOKA PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O.DEVULAPALLI VILLAGE, DAKKILI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. GALI SRINIVASULU,, S/O.RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.DEVULAPALLI VILLAGE, DAKKILI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. KOPPALA PENCHALAIAH,, S/O.LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.DEVULAPALLI VILLAGE, DAKKILI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2 2. THE TAHSILDAR, DAKKILI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, DEVULAPALLI VILLAGE, DAKKILI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in dispossessing the petitioners from their agricultural land adnieasuring Ac.7.50 cts situated in Sy.No.223/P, Devulapalli Village, Dakkili Mandal, Tirupathi District, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to interfere nor dispossess the petitioners from the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said agricultural land and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to interfere nor dispossess the petitioners from' the peaceful possession and enjoyment of their agricultural land admeasuring Ac.7.50 cts situated in Sy.No.223/P, Devulapalli Village, Dakkili Mandal, Tirupathi District, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the status quo order dated 25.05.2023 in W.P.No. 13593 of 2023 and also dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13593 OF 2023 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 16.04.2026 KBN 4 01 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13593 of 2023 Date: 16.04.2026 KBN