KANTIPUDI RADHIKA RANI v. VOBILINENI VEERA SANKARAM
CRP/2678/2023 · 2026-04-15
Ravi Cheemalapati
Original Suitbody2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1702 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1702 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010503522023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2678/2023 Between:
1. KANTIPUDI RADHIKA RANI, W/O ADINARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.67-2-12A, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, ASHOK NAGAR, KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND
1. VOBILINENI VEERA SANKARAM, , S/O DORAYYA, AGED 69 YEARS, CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, H.NO.1-1,DANGERU, K.
GANGAVARAM MANDAL, KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 2. KANTIPUDI ADINARAYANA, (DIED)
3. BOILA BALA SURYANARAYANA, S/O VEERRAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.59-8-3/11, 83, VGM MANSION, PAND T COLONY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. VALLURI RAMYA SRUTI, , W/O ASHOK, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, 1509, PERDIDO DRIVE, EULESS, TEXAS 796039, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 5. KANTIPUDI RAJ SANJYOT, S/O ADINARAYANA, AGED 30 YEARS, 8206, STAR GRASS DRIVE, APT. 401, MANDISON, WISCONSIN, 53719, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order, dated 18.08.2023 passed in I.A.No.1143 of 2023 in O.S.No.238 of 2014, on the file of III Additional District Judge, Kakinada and allow the Civil Revision Petition, in the interest of justice and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.238 of 2014 pursuant to the order, dated 18.08.2023 in I.A.No.1143 of 2023, on the file of III Additional District Judge, Kakinada, pending the above Civil Revision Case, in the interest of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following order:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 18.08.2023 passed in I.A.No.1143 of 2023 in O.S.No.238 of 2023 by the learned Special Judge of III Addl District Judge, Kakinada. 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.238 of 2023 was dismissed as abated on 10.09.2025. 4.
In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS