Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1700 (AP)

B.HAMTHULLA MUSLIM MINORITY AND WEAKER SECTIONS v. SMT. VIJAYAKUMARI

CC/887/2023 · 2026-04-14

D Ramesh

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010066872023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 887/2023 Between: 1. B.HAMTHULLA MUSLIM MINORITY AND WEAKER SECTIONS, PORUMAMILLA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, REP. BY S.K.ABDUL KHADAR, S/O. FARID SAHEB, RESIDENT OF PORUMAMILLA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT VIJAYAKUMARI, TAHSILDAR, PORUMAMILLA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 2. A VENKATARAMANA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BADVEL DIVISION, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 3. MR VIJAYA RAMARAJU, , DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA .. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful, deliberate and intentional violation of orders 2 dated 12-09-2022 in WP No. 28025/2022 of this Hon'ble Court in implementing the orders as per direction of this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T BALASWAMI The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 12.09.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.28025 of 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the contemnors submits that they have filed counter stating that the grievance of the petitioner was considered and an endorsement was issued on 12.10.2022 and the same was also served on the petitioner. It is also made clear that on 21.03.2023, the respondents have also removed more 83 un-authorised encroachers and implemented the order dated 12.09.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.28025 of 2022. 3. Considering the above, this court is of the opinion that there is no willful disobedience on the part of the respondent-contemnors. 3 4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:15.04.2026 GK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO:887 of 2023 Dated:15.04.2026 GK