Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1696 (AP)

S Krishnamma v. K Venkataramana Reddy

CC/2159/2023 · 2026-04-14

D Ramesh

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010167122023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2159/2023 Between: 1. S KRISHNAMMA, W/O S SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 50YRS, OCC- LABOURER, R/O 6-8-75015A, JOURNALIST COLONY, ALIAS KANAKABHUSHANAM LAYOUT, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE CHITTOR DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. K VENKATARAMANA REDDY, S/O UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE- UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, AT TIRUPATHI. 2. KANAKA NARSA REDDY, S/O UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE- UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI DIVISION, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. K VENKATA RAMANA, S/O UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE- UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents/Contemnors for committing Contempt of Court by willfully disobeying /violating this Hon'ble Court order dated 11.7.2022 in W.P. No.18637 Of 2022 passed by Hon'ble JUSTICE D. RAMESH and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K INDIRA GOLDA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L 2. The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 11.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.18637 of 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the contemnors, on instructions submits that the respondents have considered the request of the petitioner and allotted the house site to the petitioner and hence the respondents have complied with the order dated 11.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.18637 of 2022. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not refuted the same. 3 4. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:15.04.2026 GK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO:2159 of 2023 Dated:15.04.2026 GK