1 APHC010426722023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4617/2023 Between: 1. RAVURU SRINUVASULU REDDY, , S/O LATE VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC, AGRICULTURE, R/O MUDIGEDU VILLAGE, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P. 2. RAVURU SUBBARAMI REDDY,, S/O LATE VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC, AGRICULTURE MUDIGEDU VILLAGE, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. T NAGESH KUMAR, THE MANDAL PRAJAPARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PODALAKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE. 2. S RATANAIAH NAIDU, THE SECRETARY, PANCHAYATHI RAJ, MUDIGEDU GRAM PANCHAYAT, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the contemnors/respondents before this Hon'ble Court and punish them for willfully, wantonly, and deliberately disobeying the orders passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No. 24748 of 2022 dated 08.08.2022 by Justice Sri BATTU DEVANAND of this Hon'ble Court, which attract U/Sec.10 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 2 1. AKKEM SRIHARIVIRAT Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G VENKATA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4617 OF 2023 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining wilful disobedience of the order, dated 08.08.2022 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.24748 of 2022. 2. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the contempt case is filed against the interim order passed by this Court and subsequently the main Writ Petition itself has been disposed of. He further submits that the respondent authorities complied the final order passed by this Court in the said Writ Petition. 3. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 10.04.2026 TM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4617/2023 Date: 10.04.2026 TM