OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION WORKERS UNION (ODPWU) AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/5949/2023 · 2026-02-08
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1692 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1692 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010228862023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5949/2023 OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION WORKERS UNION (ODPWU) AND ANR REGISTER NO. 2543 DATED 21.08.2013 HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT BORAGADHOI P.O. AND P.S. DULIAJAN DIST DIBRUGARH PIN 786602 ASSAM AND DULY REP BY TRALUKYA PHUKAN R/O NEAR CENTRAL NAMGHAR PRAGATI PATH DULIAJAN P.O. AND P.S DULIAJAN DIST.
DIBRUGARH PIN 786602 ASSAM 2: TRALUKYA PHUKAN S/O SUREN PHUKAN R/O NEAR CENTRAL NAMGHAR PRAGATI PATH DULIJAN P.O. AND P.S. DULIJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN 786602 ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM LABOUR WELFARE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWHATI 6 ASSAM 2:THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER CUM REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS ASSAM OFFICT OF LABOUR COMMISSIONOER GOPINATH NAGAR GHY 16 ASSAM 3:THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH P.O. P.S AND DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786001 4:THE LABOUR INSPECTOR DIBRUGARH P.O. P.S AND DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786001 5:THE LABOUR INSPECTOR JOYPUR P.O. AND P.S. JOYPUR DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN 786614 ASSAM 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH
Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM PIN 786001 7:TANUJ GOGOI S/O LT. MUNINDRA GOGOIR/O NAHARKATIA KOLIAPANI DIST.
DIBRUGARH PIN 786602 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M BARMAN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR SAURADEEP DEY(R-7)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 09.02.2026 Mr. M. Barman, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that due to afflux of time, the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. S.R. Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Barman, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition being infructuous, stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant