Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010439042023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 22773/2023
Between:
1. M/S. JVR INDUSTRIES, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR P. JAYA RAJU, R/O PLOT NO.C-10, INDUSTRIAL PARK(IDA), RACHAGUNNERI VILLAGE,SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOV OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.,BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, A.P.SECRETARIAT , VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT,TIRUPATHI,
3. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLOT NO.OS-2, 2ND CROSS,
3RD ROAD, INDUSTRIAL PARL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or a writ, Particularly
2 one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the actions of the respondent No.3 in not providing the working capital to the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary, and to release working capital to me to run the industry in the interest of justice and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Interim order directing consider my representation dated 06.06.2022 and consequently direct respondent Nos.1 and 3 not to conduct auction of the assets of unit till disposal of the Writ petition and be further pleased to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G SRI HARSHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. G R SUDHAKAR
2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22773 of 2023 The Court made the following Order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Video Conference submits that in view of the subsequent events, cause in the present Writ Petition does not survives for further adjudication.
2. Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3-Corporation is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.04.2026 PSA