Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1689 (AP)

SMT.PILLA GAYATRI DEVI v. SMT. A.SURYA KUMARI

CC/1236/2023 · 2026-04-07

D Ramesh

Public Interest Litigationbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010095012023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1236/2023 Between: 1. SMT.PILLA GAYATRI DEVI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O.SRIPILLA SURYANARAYANA PATRUDU, R/OCHINTHALAPALEM VILLAGE, KOTHAVALASA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. SMT.SAMPATHRAOTARAKESWARI,, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O SRI SAMPATHRAOKARUNAKARACHITTIBABU, R/O CHINTHALAPALEM VILLAGE, KOTHAVALASA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONERS ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SMT A SURYA KUMARI, DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM. 2. M SRUJANA, DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. . 3. T TARAKESU, SUB-REGISTRAR, KOTHAVALASA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2 4. D M G N PRASAD RAO, TAHSILDAR, KOTHAVALASA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the Respondents and punish them under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilfully violating the order dated 01.08.2022 in W.P.No.24734 of 2021 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents herein to take immediate steps to delete the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.16.60 cents in Sy.No.111/1 of Chintalapalem Village, Kothavalasa Mandal, Vizianagaram Districtfrom Prohibited Properties list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act. 1906 and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 01.08.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.24734 of 2021. 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that order dated 01.08.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.24734 of 2021 has been complied with and prays to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:08.04.2026 GK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO:1236 of 2023 Dated:08.04.2026 GK