Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1680 (GAU)

THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SRI MAHENDRA RAY AND ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/1062/2023 · 2026-03-05

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010086262023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1062/2023 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE AT 3 MIDDLETON STREET CALCUTTA- 700071 REP. BY THE MANAGER GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005. VERSUS SRI MAHENDRA RAY AND ORS. S/O- LATE ASWINI RAY 2:SRI DIBAKAR RAY S/O- LATE ASWINI RAY 3:MISS MALATI RAY D/O- LATE ASWINI RAY 4:MISS JILI RAY D/O- LATE ASWINI RAY (ALL ARE SIBLINGS OF LATE HEMLOTA RAY) ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL.- SINGIMARI (BRAHMTAL) P.O. NAYAGAON P.S. ABHAYAPURI DIST.- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783384. 5:ON THE DEATH OF SAMSUDDIN ANSARI Page No.# 2/3 HIS LEGAL HEIRS NAMELY- 5.1:SMT. KHUSBUN NESSA W/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI 5.2:SIRAJUDDIN ANSARI S/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI 5.3:AKLAKQUE ANSARI S/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI 5.4:EKRAM ANSARI S/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI 5.5:IQBAL ANSARI S/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI 5.6:SMT. RUBINA KHATUN D/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI 5.7:SMT. TAMANNA KHATUN D/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI 5.8:SMT. HENA KHATUN D/O LATE SHAMSUDDIN ANSARI ALL ARE RESIDENT OF 1/3 J.K. GHOSH ROAD P.O. BELGACHIA P.S. ULTADANGA KOLKATA WEST BENGAL PIN- 700037. PRESENT ADDRESS 83E/1B/H/14 BELGACHIA ROAD P.O. BELGACHIA P.S. ULTADANGA Page No.# 3/3 KOLKATA WEST BENGAL PIN 700037. ------------ Advocate for : MS. R D MOZUMDAR Advocate for : appearing for SRI MAHENDRA RAY AND ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 06.03.2026 Heard Ms. R. D. Mozumdar, learned counsel for the applicant/Insurance company. This Interlocutory Application has been preferred for setting aside of the abetment of the connected application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal. The delay in preferring the substitution application has already been condoned. Accordingly, the abetment of the condonation application is hereby set aside and hence this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant