APHC010094482023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1505/2023 Between: 1. T.RAMAKRISHNA RAO, S/O T.VENKATRAYALU CHETTY, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O D.NO.18-1-504/4A, BHAVANI NAGAR LAYOUT, TIRUPATI. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED A N D 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI GAJULAMANDYAM P.S., TIRUPATI. 2. P SEKHAR, S/O LAZARUS, AGED 58 YEARS, CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, SETTIPALLI BRANCH, TIRUPATI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash FIR No.165/2022 dated 22.11.2022 on the file of Gajulamandyam Police Station, Tirupati, against the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No.165/2022 dated 22.11.2022 on the file of Gajulamandyam Police Station, Tirupatiand pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. S PRANATHI SRK, J Crl.P.No.1505 of 2023 2 Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: SRK, J Crl.P.No.1505 of 2023 3 O R D E R This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioner herein/Accused No.1, to quash the proceedings in FIR No.165 of 2022 of Gajulamandyam Police Station, Tirupati, registered against the petitioner herein/A1 and other accused, for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 submits that the matter has been settled by the parties outside the Court and in view of the same, the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive for adjudication, rendering the Criminal Petition infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. ___ __________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 9th April, 2026. DNB