APHC010469992023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2342/2023 Between: 1. BATTARUSETTY LAKSHMI, W / O RAMANAIAT, AGED 55 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.50-88-7/4, SANTHIPURAM, SEETHAMPET, VISAKHAPATNAM - 16. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHAIK JAHANAR, W/O SHAIK NAGOOR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.82, R.H COLONY, PM PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SHAIK NAGOOR, , S/O HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RETIRED TEACHER, R/O D.NO.82, R.H COLONY, PM PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the present Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the order dated 21.03.2023 passed in 1.A.798 of 2022 in OS.1675 of 2019 on the file of the Honourable III Additional Junior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam and consequently allow 1.A.798 of 2022 in OS.1675 of 2019 on the file of the Honourable III Additional Junior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceeding in OS NO. 1675 of 2019 on the file of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam pending disposal of above Civil Revision Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following order: This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order 21.03.2023 passed in I.A.No.798 of 2022 in O.S.No.1675 of 2019 by the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.1675 of 2019 was decreed partly on 08.07.2025. 3. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous . 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS