IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13178 of 2023 ====================================================== 1. Rahul Singh Son of Late Nagina Singh resident of village Imaliya, P.S.- Pali kako, Anchal kako, District Jehanabad. 2. Brijnandan Singh, S/o Late Ramswarath Singh resident of village Imaliya, P.S.- Pali kako, Anchal kako, District Jehanabad. 3. Chandan Kumar, Late Anandi Singh resident of village Imaliya, P.S.- Pali kako, Anchal kako, District Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner, Patna. 3. The Collector Patna cum District Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Patna. 4. The Additional Collector, Patna. 5. The Anchal Adhikari, Dhanarua Anchal, District Patna. 6. Girja Yadav @ Girjanand Singh, S/o Late Motilal Gope resident of village Janakpur, P.O Khalilabad Nataul, P.S.- Kadirganj, District Patna. 7. Anup Kumar, fathers name not known to the petitioners resident of village Janakpur, P.O Khalilabad Nataul, P.S.- Kadirganj, District Patna. 8. Sandeep Kumar, fathers name not known to the petitioners resident of village Janakpur, P.O Khalilabad Nataul, P.S.- Kadirganj, District Patna. 9. Awinash Kumar Mohan, fathers name not known to the petitioners resident of village Janakpur, P.O Khalilabad Nataul, P.S.- Kadirganj, District Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan ( Sc 25 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 07-04-2026 Heard Mr. Amarendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for issuance of writ of appropriate Patna High Court CWJC No.13178 of 2023(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/4 nature, order or direction quashing orders order dt. 11.5.2023 under signature of the District Public Grievance Redressal Officer Patna in connection with the Complaint case no. 99990113022301646/ 2A under Bihar Public Grievance redressal Act and letter no. 4010 dated 06.06.2023 and the proceeding being maintained thereto in complaint- case 99990113022301646/2A; 99999011302336275/1A; 999991240123356773/2A improperly Bihar Public Grievance Redressal Act at various level involving in it the properties of petitioners and their family members who after acquiring it through sale deed no, 6603 dated 31.07.1964 in the name of Ram Swarath Singh (ancestors of petitioners no. 1 &2) and sale deed dated 1.02.89 in the name of Raj Kishore Narain Singh, the ancestor of petitioner no. 3 are in possession of those land and respdt. no. 6 is litigating T.S 433/2018 in the court of learned Sub Judge 1 Masaudhi for it. The petitioners also pray for quashing notice issued by the respdt no. 5 (the Anchal Patna High Court CWJC No.13178 of 2023(2) dt.07-04-2026 3/4 Adhikari Dhanarua), District Patna contained in letter no. 1895 dated 05.08.2023 in the name of petitioner no. 1 & 3 in connection to the complaint case no. 999991240123358773 under the Bihar Public Grievance Redressal Act relating to some of plots of the property acquired/ inherited through said sale deed no. 6603 dated 31.07.1964 in the name of Ram Swarath Singh (ancestors of petitioners no. 1 &2) and sale deed dated 1.02.89 in the name of Raj Kishore Narain Singh. The respondents are entertaining and exercising power under the Bihar Public Grievance Redressal Act improperly on the complaints of private respondents and pass orders behind the back of land owners and without competent jurisdiction under the Act. They are also keeping themselves oblivious and ignorant to Title Suit no. 433/2018 filed by private respondents against the petitions, which is pending in the court of Sub Judge 1 Masaudhi and run simultaneous enquiry/proceeding illegally.” 3. Learned State counsel has pointed out that the Patna High Court CWJC No.13178 of 2023(2) dt.07-04-2026 4/4 parties are litigating Title Suit No. 433 of 2018 before a competent Court at Masaudhi, Patna. 4. This Court is of the view that if there is any problem relating to the land in question, the petitioners ought to have approached the said Court bringing to his/her record by filing an appropriate petition so that the matter is taken to its logical conclusion. 5. Allowing the petitioner to continue doing needful in the aforesaid Title Suit No. 433 of 2018, the writ petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U